Felix Miata wrote: > If you like complications, by all means that should help. :-p
Hehe, actually, I hate complications... Maybe I am just looking for an easy answer to building sites with EMs vs PX or %. :( Well constructed EM layouts are very impressive to me. > There's really no need to consider px at all. I think in 1/8s or tenths > or multiples of an em. Everything thus relates to font size, and > everything holds proportion as font size gets changed. I love that about EM layouts, but it seems so imprecise... I come from more of a print background - I wonder if I will ever shake that "perfectionist" attitude? > You need to do a better job of teaching your client about the kind of > precision that makes sense in the fluid medium that is the web. Hold > your proportions with ems. You have no idea how big any px but your own > is anyway. Very good point. I think I am also one who needs to learn how to break-away from pixel perfection. > Browsers do round differently. Opera & IE truncate more than round > [...] > need to look at the same web page in two different browsers at the same > time, so no one should know if there's any detectable difference. Very true. Hehe, sometimes I forget that most folks stick to one browser... Well, great information/advice (as always) and thanks for sharing, I really appreciate your time and expertise. :) Have a great day. Cheers, Micky ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
