On 06/10/02 02:02 (GMT+0200) Eystein Alnaes apparently typed: > But this[1] doesn't exactly get my hopes up.
> [1] <http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/auth/IE/images/SS-fat-70-096-IE6med.png> That's from Win98. Win2K is equally bad. WinXP is much better with cleartype enabled. The IE screenshots linked to from http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/auth/pxmonkeys.html were taken from WinXP, and are representative of the current state of what doze can do. Something else that image shows is one potential advantage of higher resolution. That image is from a 1024x768 (XGA) resolution source. A switch to 1400x1050 (SXGA+) on the same display size brings that 18px (1.1230em) font physically down to the size of the 13px font you see in that image. Even with no font smoothing that means a much higher apparently quality font due to all those extra px packed into the smaller space. It's just one reason why IE people using high resolution get frustrated by pages that set sizes in px. Not only are the fonts unresizable and too small, but also the much better quality that is available is simply not utilized. -- "The Lord is my strength and my shield; my heart trusts in him, and I am helped." Psalm 28:7 NIV Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 Felix Miata *** http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/ ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
