On 19/01/2007 17:50, Chris wrote:
> Hi, I have a problem with the following style declarations with
> regard to specificity:
>
> li:hover table #one{background: red;} /* 0,1,0,2 */ li li:hover
> #all{background: blue;} /* 0,1,0,2 */
>
> The comments at the end of the declarations are my understanding of
> the specificity. The first style applies to a <td> element within a
> table, and the second applies to a <tr> element within the same
> table. Since the specificity is the same for both I expected the
> table row to have a background colour of blue since it is the last
> statement in the style declaration. For some reason the table row is
> blue but the single <td> element is still red, (<td> is an element
> within <tr>). What have I missed?
>
I'm not sure I understand your question, but there's no reason I can see
that the <td> shouldn't be red. It doesn't inherit its BG colour from
its parent.
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
