Matt Dawson wrote:
> Still, if you ever end up with a page where there is a small amount
> of content - especially on a big screen - that container will still
> stretch to the bottom of the page, leaving a largely empty column.
In such a case one will indeed end up with a largely empty column on an
otherwise largely empty screen/window. Some want that, while others
don't. I don't see a problem here, as a largely empty page will end up
looking largely empty anyway, and that is often the case at an early
design-stage.
Most web pages end up with enough content to push the boundaries, so I'm
in line with Zoe on this point - it will probably become a non-issue
that one shouldn't worry about at any stage.
FWIW: I rarely see, or have, any need for such stretching-methods.
Having working stretching-methods available in case someone asks for
such a solution, is an entirely different matter. That goes for a lot of
layout methods that I normally don't use myself, as it is always good to
have options, IMO.
regards
Georg
--
http://www.gunlaug.no
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
