David Dorward wrote: > If by "pass" you mean "Fails to recognise the non-standard public > identifier, warns about not knowing if it should be treating this as > XML or SGML[1], uses the URI to the DTD instead of its local catalog > for HTML 4.01 Strict, and then validates against that". > > [1] Thank-you so very much XHTML 1.0 Appendix C
Exactly. Looks like the perfect "passed validation" mess to me... <http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.gunlaug.no%2Ftos%2Falien%2Ftest_07_4481.html&charset=%28detect+automatically%29&doctype=Inline&ss=1&verbose=1> ...and a bit better than with the original DTD... <http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.gunlaug.no%2Ftos%2Falien%2Ftest_07_4480.html&charset=%28detect+automatically%29&doctype=Inline&ss=1&verbose=1> ...but of course it is better with the "recommended" DTD... <http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.gunlaug.no%2Ftos%2Falien%2Ftest_07_4482.html&charset=%28detect+automatically%29&doctype=Inline&ss=1&verbose=1> So now all we need is for the validator to give a pass on this... <http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.gunlaug.no%2Ftos%2Falien%2Ftest_07_4483.html&charset=%28detect+automatically%29&doctype=Inline&ss=1&verbose=1> ...if someone can decide that we can do without versioning. I'll rather get a pass from the validator - and all major browsers - on this... <http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.gunlaug.no%2Ftos%2Falien%2Ftest_07_4484.xhtml&charset=%28detect+automatically%29&doctype=Inline&ss=1&verbose=1> ...so I can focus on CSS again. regards Georg -- http://www.gunlaug.no ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
