Brian Crescimanno wrote: > On 6/20/07, Zoe M. Gillenwater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> (You really should try to get your client to upgrade to IE 6 at least. >> Try telling them that their browser is several years old and thus >> vulnerable to lots of virus and spyware attacks. That usually works.) > > Good technique; and where I go here may be out of bounds--but I think > it warrants discussion: is there a browser version you can point to > and say "look, I'm sorry, we just can't support that." In my opinion, > IE 5.5 has not been "standard issue" since 2000 or early 2001 at the > very latest; that is, it is at the very least 6-7 years old. > > I would hope, at this point, we can all agree that attempting to > support Netscape 4.x (released 1998) or IE 4.x, and probably 5.x is > just out of the question. But when is it reasonable for us to point > to IE5.5, its broken box model, and its complete lack of support from > Microsoft and say "Nope, not doing it." Quite frankly, I'm already in > that boat personally, but I do see a lot of people still considering > it at this point and I really do wonder why.
Start charging extra for support on Old Browser vX.XX? ;-) -- David [EMAIL PROTECTED] authenticity, honesty, community ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
