On 7/24/07, Philippe Wittenbergh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok, what about this: making sure that your element has enough content > in order to show your background image ? Then you don't need the > 'hasLayout' trigger, min-height here.
for the default text size (at least on my computer - i haven't changed it), the background image (an expand/collapse arrow) displays fine without the min-height rule. i coded my header sizes in em, but the background image is (of course) in pixels, so as long as someone viewing the page sees the header size as 15px or more, it's not an issue. i wanted to make sure people with smaller font sizes (or dpi, or whatever) could still see the whole arrow though, which is why i added the rule. > <http://www.satzansatz.de/cssd/onhavinglayout.html#reset> > lists _some_ ways to reset (un-Layout). what makes your suggestion of this site so ironic is that that's where i went to see what the ie7 hasLayout triggers were to confirm that one of my rules was giving (or not giving) my header hasLayout. obviously i should have keep reading. :p in my case i'll just break the min-height rule for ie7 by overriding the minimum i set in my "for all browsers rule" with an ie7-specific "auto". in the rare case someone on ie7 will see a cutoff arrow, they'll just have to live with it i guess. fortunately i don't think it will be a common situation at all. thanks for the help philippe. :) ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
