Bob Rosenberg wrote: > [http://users.rcn.com/rtberg2/hp_ctr.html] But now I find that the > "Back" function doesn't work in IE6! Does anyone have any insight > into this sort of problem?
I've seen plenty of problems with badly constructed CSS based workarounds for 'position: fixed' in IE6, but, as mentioned below: the source code in your page is of much too low quality to bother debugging your construction. > It's the xhtml1-transitional DTD. Well, it sure is *not* xhtml 1.0 Transitional, no matter what the DTD says... <http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://users.rcn.com/rtberg2/hp_ctr.html> <http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fusers.rcn.com%2Frtberg2%2Fhp_ctr.html&charset=%28detect+automatically%29&doctype=Inline&ss=1&group=0&st=1> ...and it looks like Tidy gave up on it. > Any hard-won wisdom on this one? Well, I normally wouldn't run IE6 in standard mode with such a construction, but I haven't managed to break the [back] button no matter how I run my CSS based version... <http://www.gunlaug.no/contents/wd_additions_17.html> ...but I know many can't get it to work. I prefer the alternative 'position: fixed' workaround with an IE-expression... <http://www.gunlaug.no/contents/wd_additions_15.html> ...and haven't experienced any real problems with that one. Another detail: I can't really see the point in having duplicate menus, as the proper 'position: fixed' doesn't rely on where the element is in the source code. So why not use the "IE6 menu" in all browsers? regards Georg -- http://www.gunlaug.no ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
