Yeah, I agree with David - though I would probably have wrapped it in standardista: "Just be clear: are you designing for your client, or your client's customers?" :)
Your clients will ultimately be rewarded if focused on the latter, though failing to cater to their whims might get you thrown out. You may not want that type of client anyway. Good luck, Brian -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Laakso Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 11:54 AM To: Portman Cc: CSS List Subject: Re: [css-d] Menu/navigation problem Portman wrote: > Thank you for the reply and suggestion, David. I did think of that > but my client wants all the blocks the same height and width. > > Riva > > David Laakso wrote: > >> Trying to cram all those long word menu links into narrow >> width/height spaces /may/ require some re-thinking of the layout >> concept to achieve at least relatively reasonable usability (and even at that it is fragile). >> >> Cursory tested in Opera, Camino; and, IE6 and IE7. >> >> <http://www.chelseacreekstudio.com/ca/cssd/menu.html> >> >> Best, >> >> ~dL >> Go for it. Give them what they want and they get what they deserve (personal opinion of course). ~d -- http://chelseacreekstudio.com/ ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/ ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
