Gunlaug Sørtun wrote: > Erik Harris wrote: > > >> I think Davoud's response shows us why the answer to the question >> posed in the subject is "virtually nothing." There are too many >> people using other browsers, and unless we're going to be creating >> websites to work specifically in Firefox, we're still going to have >> to work with the lowest common denominator in the name of site, which >> has NEVER been Firefox, in the name of "site stability." >> > > I think someone is defining "site stability" on the wrong premises. No > site will ever work and render the same in all browsers, no matter what > lowest common denominator one uses. Neither should they. > Interesting... now I'm curious.
While I don't have any major problem with (a little) different versions in different browsers (or mayor when so was desired), I see no reason why they *shouldn't* render the same, given that the content is the same. Was this some kind of "typo" or there's a reason behind it? Rafael. ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/