At 02:41 AM 12/2/2007, Gunlaug Sørtun wrote: >>I suppose I should install Opera and Safari, too, but I just haven't >> bothered (and at least Opera is good enough with standards >>compliance that I wouldn't expect anything I'd be doing would break >>it. > >You should have all major browsers available for testing even if they >are pretty close on most CSS related stuff. Firefox 3.0b1 doesn't look >too bad so far, but Fx 2 is/was a bit behind.
With all due respect to Opera and Safari's users, based on the visitor stats of the sites I manage (and on stats from sites like thecounter.com), by testing in Firefox and IE, I _am_ testing for all _major_ browsers. I should probably add Safari, as its usage seems to be approaching 5%, but Opera is hardly even a blip on the radar, usually falling below "unknown" or "other" on the various lists. Yeah, I know Opera includes a built-in user agent switcher that could deflate its stats, but if it's own users won't even stand up and be counted, I'm not going to bother trying to guess how many of them there might be. :) Erik Harris http://www.eHarrisHome.com - AIM: KngFuJoe - Yahoo IM: kungfujoe7 - ICQ: 2610172 - Chinese-Indonesian Martial Arts Club http://www.kungfu-silat.com ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
