Bill Brown wrote:
> Wow, what a rumpus this stirred up. I just want to clarify a few
> things and then I'm gonna let this die.
It was such an informative thread. Always good to know how others solve
problems. One never knows when it may come handy.
> First off, "future-proof" is the worst declaration in the world.
Indeed! Such declarations are best aimed short, as the conditions may
have changed too much in a few weeks time.
BTW: I wonder how long my "ugliest non-IE/win hack ever invented"[1]
will work. Maybe I'll have to extend it[2] and hope good browsers don't
run out of steam anytime soon.
> My comments and replies in the future will not be broadcast, but
> returned only to the sender as this seems more appropriate for the
> present condition of this list.
Please rethink your policy, and stay public.
There will sometimes be some formulations that can be interpreted as
attacks, and some that really are. However, they can safely be ignored
while focusing on the issue at hand and sharing what one has to say
about it with those who _may_ need to know - in public.
regards
Georg
[1]http://www.gunlaug.no/contents/wd_chaos_28.html
[2]http://www.gunlaug.no/contents/wd_chaos_28-b.html
--
http://www.gunlaug.no
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
