On Jul 6, 2008, at 5:25 PM, Jens Nedal wrote: >> >> > When for example a Screenreader tries reading that list, the > information > about levels is lost, in contrary to actually nesting the ul elements. > Semantically all you have is list with one level, nothing else. > > In terms of have a structure that already conveys meaning without > styling i would regard this as bad practice. > > regards, Jens >
I had a feeling it was something like that. If you only knew what the backside looks like to make it happen correctly....I'm working on it though. Thanks, Barrett AOL/AIM handmadepaperus ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
