On Sep 4, 2008, at 11:15 PM, Gabriele Romanato wrote: > Original browsers have their own rendering engine which is unique and > different from any other > browser (Firefox, IE, Safari, Opera),
Firefox and Safari use open-source rendering engines, available for anyone to use. Opera and IE's rendering engines are unique in that they are closed source and only available to them. > > while clonings have simply copied and > pasted their rendering > engine from original browsers ones (K-Meleon, Flock, ecc.) They didn't 'copy and paste' their rendering engines. They did the exact same thing Firefox, Safari, Camino and Chrome did: they put an open-source rendering engine in their browser. Right now I wouldn't do any serious testing in Chrome as it's beta and they are a few months behind on their Webkit version. But if it gains marketshare and they add new CSS features to it and don't push it back to Webkit, we will probably have to test it too. Don't be so quick to discount a new browser. It's great to have more options for users and more competition :) -Ryan Ryan Doherty [EMAIL PROTECTED] ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
