--- On Tue, 11/4/08, Doug Jolley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just noticed that apparently the full spectrum of
> list-style-types
> apply equally to both ordered lists and unordered lists.
> So, ordered
> lists can have a list-style-type of "disc" and
> unordered lists can
> have a list-style-type of "decimal". Does anyone
> see any reason why
> ALL list-style-types can't be applied to both ordered
> and unordered
> lists? I guess the only reason that we have 2 types of
> lists is
> backward compatibility.
Obviously, in context, one will make semantic sense more than the other. I
guess it would be too much of a special case to restrict the values depending
on element. It does raise an interesting question of quite how browsers should
handle "decimal" on an unordered list.
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
