--- On Tue, 11/4/08, Doug Jolley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I just noticed that apparently the full spectrum of > list-style-types > apply equally to both ordered lists and unordered lists. > So, ordered > lists can have a list-style-type of "disc" and > unordered lists can > have a list-style-type of "decimal". Does anyone > see any reason why > ALL list-style-types can't be applied to both ordered > and unordered > lists? I guess the only reason that we have 2 types of > lists is > backward compatibility.
Obviously, in context, one will make semantic sense more than the other. I guess it would be too much of a special case to restrict the values depending on element. It does raise an interesting question of quite how browsers should handle "decimal" on an unordered list. ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/