[email protected] wrote: > Scott Demontluzin" <[email protected]> wrote > > change > #wrapper { width: 55%; } to > #wrapper { width: 520px;} > > Scott > > Thank you Scott. That takes me down to a width of 1024px at any rate. I don't > yet understand why it works, but I hope to. > I wonder how much longer we will have to worry about widths less than 1024.
As long as visitors (like me) can use their browsers at widths narrower than 1024, we should accommodate them. Also, the web reaches beyond the desktop. Users of iPhones/iTouches and other mobile browsing devices don't have a choice. > I still wonder whenever I see width: 55%; , 55% of what? I'm working on it. 55% of the block containing that element. If it were a paragraph inside the body inside the browser window, it would default to 55% of the width of the browser window. -- David [email protected] authenticity, honesty, community ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [[email protected]] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
