On 13/01/2009, at 6:11 PM, David Laakso wrote: >>>>> The site is at: http://farmpeacelove.com/italiano/alloggio >>>>> >>> >> At the moment I only test the page through browsershot.org -- and >> zoom: 1 didn't fix the problem. >> > > As of this writing your page is crashing: > <snip>
> > Validate the CSS? I get 4 errors: URI : http://farmpeacelove.com/css/typography.css 27: Unknown pseudo-element or pseudo-class :last-child URI : http://farmpeacelove.com/css/screen.css 31: h1, h2, #main h3: Property text-shadow doesn't exist in CSS level 2.1 but exists in [css2, css3] : 0 1px 1px rgba(0,0,0,0.6) 46: .box: Value Error : background-color rgba(224,219,206,0.3) is not a background-color value : rgba(224,219,206,0.3) 97: * html .mini_gallery li: Property zoom doesn't exist : 1 The question is: can't I use CSS3 properties? and if I do implement CSS3 properties, would they validate in a CSS 2.1 validator? (my logic would say: no, they will not)... Still I do think there is no reason to avoid them -- especially if older browsers either ignore unknown properties or I hide it from them. The only one I don't understand from the above errors is the "Property zoom doesn't exist : 1" -- I just don't know enough about zoom: 1 besides that I know it is used for having layout. Your thoughts? Elle http://designbyelle.com.au/ ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
