--- On Wed, 6/17/09, Richard Grevers <richard.grev...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Google chrome (2.0.172.31) appears to > minimise the width of floated > tables which have no explicit width, while most other > browsers assume > 100%. Is this actually a bug or just one of those undefined > behaviours > that serve as a lesson to always follow Braden's mantra? I've always been led to believe that "float without explicit width" is a no-no, but I think this might only be due to poor browser implementations. From the spec: "10.3.5 Floating, non-replaced elements - If 'width' is computed as 'auto', the used value is the "shrink-to-fit" width." http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/visudet.html#float-width As I read that, Google chrome is the only browser that behaves correctly - over to someone else to correct ME though :) - Bobby ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/