MEM wrote:
>> Providing you have checked the page  thoroughly cross os/browser, it is
>> fairly safe to ignore such "warnings."
>>
>>     
>
> Hello David,
> :)
>
> I was trying to follow those steps: 
>
> 1) Solve warnings.
>   






Solve problems. Warnings on a local file will generally take care of 
themselves.



The uri you provided is:
<http://www.nuvemk.com/rebelate/rebelatehome/home.html>

The w3c validation service this this to say about your uri.
CSS
<http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?profile=css21&warning=0&uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nuvemk.com%2Frebelate%2Frebelatehome%2Fhome.html>
This document validates as CSS level 2.1 !
Markup
<http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1&uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nuvemk.com%2Frebelate%2Frebelatehome%2Fhome.html>
This document was successfully checked as XHTML 1.0 Transitional!








______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/

Reply via email to