MEM wrote: >> Providing you have checked the page thoroughly cross os/browser, it is >> fairly safe to ignore such "warnings." >> >> > > Hello David, > :) > > I was trying to follow those steps: > > 1) Solve warnings. >
Solve problems. Warnings on a local file will generally take care of themselves. The uri you provided is: <http://www.nuvemk.com/rebelate/rebelatehome/home.html> The w3c validation service this this to say about your uri. CSS <http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?profile=css21&warning=0&uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nuvemk.com%2Frebelate%2Frebelatehome%2Fhome.html> This document validates as CSS level 2.1 ! Markup <http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1&uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nuvemk.com%2Frebelate%2Frebelatehome%2Fhome.html> This document was successfully checked as XHTML 1.0 Transitional! ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/