Apparently, Micro$oft IS complying with standards but it is their standards they are complying with NOT international standards.
When they brought out IE8, they said they are doing us all a favor by "trying" to comply with international standards. I guess they are still trying but NOT hard enough! --- On Mon, 11/9/09, Theresa Mesa <trixiesirishe...@gmail.com> wrote: > From: Theresa Mesa <trixiesirishe...@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [css-d] The holy grail > To: "Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh" <sandy.pittendr...@gmail.com> > Cc: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org > Date: Monday, November 9, 2009, 3:38 AM > That would definitely be the Holy > Grail... > > Stoopid IE. > > Let each browser express itself differently, as long as > each is > standards compliant and plays well with others. I find, at > least so > far, that with the exception of IE6, if I build > standardized code that > validates, I can get it to display almost exactly the same > on every > browser. Usually. > > > Theresa > > > On Nov 8, 2009, at 6:55 PM, Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh > wrote: > > > The holy grail is that place we'll all be to (soon, I > think) > > when we can finally stop worrying, thinking about and > dealing > > with IEsicks. > > > > -- > > /* Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh >--oO0> > */ > > ______________________________________________________________________ > css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] > http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d > List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ > List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html > Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/ > ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
