tedd wrote: > At 9:19 PM -0400 8/10/10, David Laakso wrote: >> Gabriele Romanato wrote: >>> Hi! >>> need some responses and criticisms about my opinions expressed right >>> here: >>> >>> >>> http://onwebdev.blogspot.com/2010/08/css3-animations-considered-harmful.html >>> >>> HTH ^^/ >>> >> > Gabriele Romanato >> >> >> CSS is a programming language: albeit, a very simple one. It copes with >> "look and feel." Expanding CSS to include more than that is scary. But >> therein may, or may not, lie the future. /Push the envelope./ >> >> Best, >> ~d > > I agree and was very close to responding as such. However, I didn't > think my contribution would amount to anything in that forum. > > In any event, people who say that CSS is not a programming language > must have a better understanding of programming than me -- after all, > I only wrote my first line of code 45 years ago and still haven't > mastered it.
CSS isn't a programming language. No control constructs like IF/THEN/ELSEIF, SWITCH, etc. No variables. The only programming language presence really are the MS extensions (Javascript functions). -- David gn...@hawaii.rr.com authenticity, honesty, community ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
