You're probably right. I have noticed that some results are different when * is
not included, but haven't gotten clear on exactly what.
------------------
On 8/26/10 at 11:44 AM -0700, Thierry Koblentz wrote in a message entitled
"Re: [css-d] iPad":
> > Add a -webkit-text-size-adjust tag to avoid small text being scaled up
>> to a minimum size:
>>
>> *, body { -webkit-text-size-adjust:100%; }
>
>Isn't the same as:
>
>* { -webkit-text-size-adjust:100%; }
>
>It is said that using the universal selector is bad regarding performance,
>would "-webkit-text-size-adjust" not be inherited if used like this:
>
>body { -webkit-text-size-adjust:100%; }
>
>--
>Regards,
>Thierry
>www.tjkdesign.com | www.ez-css.org | @thierrykoblentz
--
___________________________________________________
RICK GORDON
EMERALD VALLEY GRAPHICS AND CONSULTING
___________________________________________________
WWW: http://www.shelterpub.com
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
