On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Sandy <sfeld...@sympatico.ca> wrote: > >> That being said, if one font looks blocky on someone's >> windows 95 box with IE 6, then all fonts look blocky, so they wouldn't >> know the difference. >> > good point Christian. So - worth using? Do the load times have you sitting > there drumming your fingers wondering what's wrong, or is it just a hair > longer than you expect? Do you have a link to a site which uses this service > you could pass along?
I don't have any links but to answer your question, the load time isn't bad compared to using images for all your headers, and it's probably way better than using other techniques that involve generating SWFs or generating images on-the-fly for dynamic text, but I would say don't use it for body copy because that would take too long. As Shanna said, try to stick to headers only. -- -- Christian Montoya mappdev.com :: christianmontoya.net ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
