On 2010/10/20 17:04 (GMT-0700) Corona Rivera composed:

> Would someone please explain why EM is usually used for the width property 
> instead of Pixels?

> I'm inclined to use pixels since that's the monitor's unit of measurement but 
> Adobe and most CSS examples I see use the M. - How come?

A device px isn't necessarily the same thing as a CSS px. As a practical matter 
the difference isn't yet well
supported by technology. Device px density covers a rather wide range today, 
and widening, compared to
yesteryear, while a CSS px is defined in the spec without regard to device 
density. Of course, this
correlation, or lack thereof, is of no material import in em-sized designs.

Sizing in em allows browsers to do what they were designed to do, while px 
sizing allows web stylists to
operate under the illusion that they have the same control over result as print 
stylists.

Sizing in em allows a design's components to retain the stylist's intended 
proportions across a broad range of
user environments, while px locks them singularly to the designer's environment 
and the environments of a
random subset of user environments that happen to coincide with that of the 
stylist.

One of the advantages of the web over print media is that web content can be 
automatically sized to the comfort
and convenience of the web browser user. Sizing in px totally disregards what 
may be comfortable or convenient
for the web browser user, operating as if the comfort and convenience of the 
visitor was of zero import
whatsoever. Web browsers over the years have developed optional features to 
defend against px sizing, but they
cannot do as good a job, or do it automatically, as can a browser encountering 
100% user-default-based em sizing.

This subject, is arguably entirely theoretical, which, if true, would be 
outside the scope of practical
application of CSS that this list is supposed to be limited to, and likely why 
you'll probably see a limited
number of responses.
-- 
"The wise are known for their understanding, and pleasant
words are persuasive." Proverbs 16:21 (New Living Translation)

 Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409

Felix Miata  ***  http://fm.no-ip.com/
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/

Reply via email to