Folks,
This thread needs to end now. If the various parties wish to take
their disagreements to private e-mail, that's obviously fine, but the
several thousand members of the list don't need to be subjected to an
argument in which they have no part.
I will reiterate the passage Chetan quoted from the list policies,
as well as the text that follows it, because it is always relevant:
"Above all, if you can't answer with a modicum of respect,
or without feeling somehow annoyed by the question, then
DO NOT ANSWER AT ALL. I'm dead serious about this. You
may have seen and responded to a question six thousand times,
but the person asking has only heard it once: when they asked
it. They're asking it in order to fill a gap in their own
knowledge. Make your answer an encouragement for more
questions, not an incentive to unsubscribe."
- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html#ask-answer
Thank you.
--
Eric A. Meyer (http://meyerweb.com/eric/), List Chaperone
"CSS is much too interesting and elegant to be not taken seriously."
-- Martina Kosloff (http://mako4css.com/)
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
