Yeah... I was about to point out the same thing. A 180 degree rotation is not the same as a vertical reflection. The "e" should be below the "e", not the "s."
Really, to get the desired effect, you'd want transform: scaley(-1); It works in webkit. Haven't tried anything else. ---Tim > -----Original Message----- > From: css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org [mailto:css-d- > boun...@lists.css-discuss.org] On Behalf Of Charles Miller > Sent: Friday, April 15, 2011 1:58 PM > To: css-discuss discuss > Subject: Re: [css-d] Reflection effect > > > On Apr 15, 2011, at 12:16 PM, David Laakso wrote: > > > Fwiw, some captures... > > <http://www.browsercam.com/public.aspx?proj_id=549084> > > ~d > > > Am I right that none of them look like a true reflection would look? > That the bottom image is in no cases a vertical flip of the top image? > > It "challenges" my mind to think of how these might be used. (Though > if you reply that these are research results and not applied anything, I > will shut up promptly.) > > Offered not in criticism but in curiosity. > > Chuck M > > > ______________________________________________________ > ________________ > css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css- > discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d > List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- > http://css-discuss.org/policies.html > Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/ ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
