I am not advocating Richard Fink's blog as a shining example of page layout, and can't account for his decisions in typesetting. His technical knowledge of the latest in implementations of CSS font embedding is spot on though, and he can be relied upon to keep readers abreast. I think the name of the blog reflects its focus on the web as publishing medium, less an obsession with typographic best practice on the Internet per se.
His latest post on @font-face syntax [1], combined with his TTF to EOT application [2] should resolve any IE problems. The key thing to note about Google's service is that it (by all accounts deliberately) serves faulty glyphs to IE. You're far better off hosting your own fonts. [1] http://readableweb.com/new-font-face-syntax-simpler-easier/ [2] http://eotfast.com/ Regards, Barney Carroll barney.carr...@gmail.com 07594 506 381 On 17 May 2011 10:29, Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) <p.tay...@rhul.ac.uk> wrote: > > > Barney Carroll wrote: >> >> The Readable Web blog is almost my single point of reference for the >> latest on font-face. > > If it's supposed to be "The Readable Web", why does it eschew both > accepted conventions [1] for indicating the start of a new paragraph, > and rely solely on the last line of the previous paragraph ending short ? > > Philip Taylor > -------- > [1] Either additional vertical white space, or indentation, but almost never > both. > ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
