On 9/12/11 10:53 PM, "G.Sørtun" wrote:
On 13.09.2011 03:52, David Laakso wrote:
<http://chelseacreekstudio.com/>
Looks and behaves reasonably well over a window-width range from 120
to 2400 and with 'minimum font size' ranging from 9 to 32 - larger
font sizes are of course only good on not too small windows. Present
design-revision should definitely cover some ground and devices.
Surprisingly (given the general state of the web), some of the content
even makes sense... :-)
Georg
Thanks [Attending "computer-camp" this summer seems to have paid-off:-)
. I will let my parents know.]!
Best,
Milagros Sanchez
Santiago, Chile
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [[email protected]]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
