> Sounds from your comments that some/many companies feel that IE6 usage is so 
> insignificant as to make accommodating it to be more costly than any benefit 
> gotten from the accommodation.
> 
> Is that the feeling?

I work for a digital marketing agency that churns out a fairly large number of 
highly involved websites to support the campaigns of a few major brands in the 
UK.

Because most of our clients are major corporations, they often have direct 
experience of locked systems running legacy IE, and because we're in a 
competitive business with big names to please we pride ourselves in being very 
attentive to the clients' specific wants.

Having said that, what with a lot of people asking for whiz-bang bleeding edge 
front-end bells and whistles and complete cross-browser parity, we have 
recently made it a matter of policy to charge 1.5 times the front-end build if 
IE6 or 7 'total parity' is desired (in practice the figure is always different: 
some designs do just work with minimal code-forking, in which case we charge 
far less, while others are incredibly ambitious and precise, and can cost 
considerably more to perfect across browserland). Of course we build with 
platform-agnostic accessibility principles and enhance there forth, so we never 
have sites that are unusable or visually broken, but for things like, for 
example, GUIs with rotating semi-transparent imagery or somesuch, dedicated 
legacy IE support is a huge extra workload. 

We've found that announcing that pricing plan up front with the workload 
explanation, along with our analytics data to indicate the vanishingly small 
proportion of these browsers' users as a demographic, makes legacy browser work 
a lot more sane: either the client realises that these users are a minority who 
do not expect flashy Internet experience and accept that they will have a 
sub-par experience, or they insist on a lot of hard work and pay accordingly.
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [[email protected]]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/

Reply via email to