On Jan 8, 2012, at 1:47 PM, Peng Yu wrote: > In the following example, no matter what z-index I set, div2 is always > above the first div. Does anybody know how to change css to make div2 > in the bottom? Why z-index does not work with transform?
In general, z-index only applies to positioned elements as already noted. http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/visuren.html#propdef-z-index However, transformed() elements establish their own stacking context, and z-index _should_ apply even if the element is not positioned. http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-2d-transforms/#introduction > Any value other than ‘none’ for the transform results in the creation of both > a stacking context and a containing block. The object acts as a containing > block for fixed positioned descendants. The text does not yet mention z-index… it was agreed within the CSS WG, however. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Apr/thread.html#msg116 BTW - a positive z-index will move your element higher in the stacking order, if you want it below (under), try a negative z-index. Philippe -- Philippe Wittenbergh http://l-c-n.com/ ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
