Ah, can't help you there. From a purely personal perspective,
I see no point in using HTML 5 until there is a formal, ratified,
W3C specification for it, rather than (as at present) "a work in
progress, intend[ed] to replace HTML 3.2, HTML 4, and XHTML 1.x." [1]
Philip Taylor
[1] http://www.w3.org/wiki/HTML/Specifications, from
[2] http://www.w3.org/html/, from
[3] http://www.w3.org/standards/webdesign/htmlcss, from
[4] http://www.w3.org/standards/webdesign/, from
[5] http://www.w3.org/standards/, from
[6] http://www.w3.org/, root.
--------
mem wrote:
On Jan 13, 2012, at 10:43 , Philip TAYLOR wrote:
Won't the correct DTD (e.g., HTML 4.01 Strict) accomplish that ?
Arrgh! My bad. I'm talking about an HTML5 page.
Something like this seems to help, but I've seen a lot of comments telling
that, that isn't applied on all users.
<meta http-equiv="X-UA-Compatible" content="IE=edge">
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
