On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Georg <gunla...@c2i.net> wrote: > On 12.07.2012 02:05, Kyle Sessions wrote: > >> My instinct would be to declare the non-vendor-prefixed one last, so >> > > if/when the browser supports that version of the declaration, it will > > overwrite the vendor-prefixed version of the declaration. Does that > > sound right? > > Yes. Always the non-prefixed version last, for the reason you state. > > > Is there something I'm not thinking of? >> > > Only that a browser vendor may choose to mess up the order/priority for > whatever reason. And if that happens they will soon have to fix their own > mess anyway, so no need for us to bother about it. > > regards > Georg
Thanks, Philippe and Georg; that all makes total sense! I saw some vendor-prefixed declarations after some non-prefixed declarations in a CSS file I'm working on, and, after a long day, I wasn't entirely sure if that was right or not. ;) Best, Kyle -- Kyle G Sessions Berkeley Electronic Press ksessi...@bepress.com 510-665-1200 + 128 www.bepress.com bepress: the frontier of scholarly publishing since 1999 Check out IR success stories on the DC Telegraph at http://blog.digitalcommons.bepress.com ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
