From: Tom Livingston <tom...@gmail.com<mailto:tom...@gmail.com>>
Date: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 9:01 AM
To: Philippe Wittenbergh <e...@l-c-n.com<mailto:e...@l-c-n.com>>
Cc: Jeff Gates <gat...@si.edu<mailto:gat...@si.edu>>, 
"css-d@lists.css-discuss.org<mailto:css-d@lists.css-discuss.org>" 
<css-d@lists.css-discuss.org<mailto:css-d@lists.css-discuss.org>>
Subject: Re: [css-d] IE Browser Mode; IE Document Mode

I was going to reply earlier with the meta I use, which is:

<meta http-equiv="X-UA-Compatible" content="IE=edge,chrome=1">

This does what Philippe describes as well as utilize Chrome Frame if the user 
has it installed.


On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 9:16 PM, Philippe Wittenbergh 
<e...@l-c-n.com<mailto:e...@l-c-n.com>> wrote:

Le 30 janv. 2013 à 02:22, "Gates, Jeff" <gat...@si.edu<mailto:gat...@si.edu>> a 
écrit :

> Right now we use a tag on our pages that tells the page to render in IE7:
> <meta http-equiv="X-UA-Compatible" content="IE=7">. In working on a new
> splash page all looked good in Firefox, Chrome, Safari but there were some
> strange things going on when I looked at it in IE8. I see that when I
> change the meta tag to display the page in IE8 instead of IE7 most of
> those issues go away. So with that in mind:
>
> If we change the meta tag to display in IE8 instead of IE7 what will
> people who are using IE7 see (what mode will our page be displayed in)? We
> no longer are supporting IE6 and below. Depending on the answer to this
> question, perhaps we should stop developing for IE7 as well. What's your
> opinion?

For _new_ documents, you should always push IE to display in the latest mode 
(that it supports):
<meta http-equiv="X-UA-Compatible" content="IE=edge">

Then test in older versions and add some adjustments as needed (i.e.via 
conditional comments).

> If we changed this to:
>
> <!DOCTYPE html>
> <html>
>
>
> How would this affect what IE7 and IE8 render our pages?

With the HTML5 doctype, IE 6 and up will all render in 'strict' mode, or their 
understanding of it…; there are some differences with what you use now (strict 
vs transitional). But as noted above, adjust for older browsers if needed.

Philippe
--
Philippe Wittenbergh
http://l-c-n.co
m


Thanks Phillipe and Tom. I read about using edge in the meta tag but in a 
number of places I found that it is recommended that edge be used for testing, 
not production. So, why not use: <meta http-equiv="X-UA-Compatible" 
content="IE=7,8,9,10" /> ? I realize that would mean we would have to update 
the tag whenever a new IE version comes out but it only appears once, in our 
head include.

Also, I ran some stats on which IE browsers our users use and it was 
encouraging: IE9=13%, IE8=9.6%, IE7=1.5%, and wonderfully IE6=.1%.

______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/

Reply via email to