Dan McCullough wrote:
> thats all fixed and valid however there is no change .. not that I thought
> it would ... was hoping however :(
Sadly whilst the HTML is now valid, that discloses that
there are 19 errors in the CSS :
http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=http%3A%2F%2Famk.tendercorp.com%2F
Perhaps once these are addressed all will be better (one
can live in hope).
Philip Taylor
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [[email protected]]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
