> >And that is not a surprise. The 'Apple Gothic' font does not contain glyphs for >those characters. Browsers then look up further down the chain, find Futura and >use that for rendering the character. All perfectly normal. > >Why did you choose 'Apple Gothic' in the first place? That is an (old) font for >Chinese characters that only has a subset of 'Western' glyphs. (and it doesn't >have a 'bold' weight, fwiw, thus bold is rendered synthetically if at all.) > >I suggest your drop that completely and use a real western font. 'Helvetica >Neue' would do fine. Or maybe use @font-face for more consistency across all >platforms. > Redesigning and old website and grabbed the same fonts as on the old one. Will take a second look. Thanks. > >
______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
