Le 8 oct. 2013 à 23:15, Chris Rockwell <ch...@chrisrockwell.com> a écrit :
> I had to look into this more: it doesn't make sense to me that an element > with `display:inline` declared would still honor an explicit width. I have > tested this in all modern browsers, and the form elements seem to be immune > to inline display when it comes to dimensions. Form controls are replaced elements (like inline images, basically), and thus sorta-kinda inline-block elements. Can't come up with the exact reference, but is noted in the HTML5 spec. PS - width does not apply to inline elements per the spec: http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/visudet.html#propdef-width But you knew that already… Le 8 oct. 2013 à 21:09, Alan Gresley <a...@css-class.com> a écrit : > For the overflow hidden inline-block, add a negative bottom margin that > equals the padding and vertical-align: bottom. This will make it close but it > will be out if the border-bottom or padding-bottom are given in pixels. Nice trick with the negative margin-bottom! If it matters to Christian to have the blocks with the overflow:hidden descendants the same height as those without, applying a little padding to the parent (equal to the margin) will do that. Philippe -- Philippe Wittenbergh http://l-c-n.com ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
