On Monday, June 23, 2014, Jon Reece <jon.re...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 8:32 PM, Philippe Wittenbergh <e...@l-c-n.com > <javascript:;>> > wrote: > > > Le 24 juin 2014 à 04:05, Tom Livingston <tom...@gmail.com <javascript:;>> > a écrit : > > > > > We found an errant z-index which was putting the content > > > behind the blue background wrapper. :-P > > > > > > Le 24 juin 2014 à 04:08, Norman Fournier <nor...@normanfournier.com > <javascript:;>> a > > écrit : > > > > > ...in that case it is interesting to see which browsers rendered that > > z-index property correctly... > > > > Most modern browsers do. However there are more properties that affect > the > > stacking / layering of content, independently of z-index. Opacity comes > to > > mind, as do some of the CSS-transform properties (and in the latter case, > > this *may* vary between browsers…). > > > > > For those interested here's a good explanation of z-index stacking order > and context, prefaced with a challenge to solve a problem rooted in what > Philippe mentioned about other properties effects on positioning. > > http://philipwalton.com/articles/what-no-one-told-you-about-z-index/ > >
Learn something new everyday! -- Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic | ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
