On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 11:11 PM, Tom Livingston <tom...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 10:32 PM, John <j...@coffeeonmars.com> wrote: > >> >> On Sep 10, 2014, at 7:21 PM, Tom Livingston <tom...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> The <a> is a stylable element independent of the img. >> >> >> OK..then would that mean that an empty a tag would have an underline? >> >> <a class=“has-border-bottom” href=“#”></a> >> > >> ^^ this would produce the bottom border of some length, even tho nothing >> is between the a tags? >> > > No because it's wrapping nothing. It's empty. Even if you gave it a width > and a height, it's won't show a text-decoration or border unless you put a > character in it. And, at least in FF, a space isn't even good enough to > make the decoration show. But that doesn't mean it's not a style-able > element. > > >> >> Or do you mean that, when something IS between the a tags, that the >> resulting bottom-border is on the a tag and not on what’s between the a >> tags? >> > > Yes. In the case of <a href=""><img src="myimg.jpg" /></a> to remove > text-decoration, you add text-decoration: none; to the <a> not the <img>. > Reading this over again, <a href=""><img src="myimg.jpg" /></a> wouldn't have any text-decoration anyway. -- Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic | ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
