nov 25 2014 00:03 Karl DeSaulniers <k...@designdrumm.com>: > Laughable maybe, invalid NO. > Whole reason for my post.
OK, but I find it a tad pretentious to argue you know the specific code of hundreds of thousands of web sites built with Word press. You obviously do not know this and neither do I. We just have differing experiences there of actual code in the wild. What I find more likely is that you’ve found that the features of Wordpress, since version something that you describe, helps you know that your Wordpress-built sites doesn’t contain validation errors. And that’s a good thing of course. ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
