>
>
>
> The second rule has no effect, since the selector in it matches no
> elements. The reason is that :first-of-type only matches an element that
> is a first child of its parent. Nothing else in a selector can change
> this. When you additionally use a class selector like .two, it simply
> imposes an additional restriction: the first child must also belong to
> the given class.
>
> You probably wanted :first-of-class, but there is no such selector in
> CSS under any name, at present.
>
> Yucca
>
>
>
Yes. Thanks Yucca.
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
