On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 11:39 AM, Felix Miata <mrma...@earthlink.net> wrote: > I don't share your best of both opinion. I like the tight focus here. There's > good when a hybrid solution is OK. Here's better when interested in a purely > CSS approach.
I can't argue with that. :) I suppose I'm just trying to think of a way to revitalize the listserv community for both CSS-d and wd-l, as they are both in same boat in terms of activity. I agree about this list having a tight focus, but that does not do much good when no one is really using it. Then again, to play devil's advocate to my own proposal, combining two inactive lists would probably just lead to more inactivity? Now my mind goes back to why. Why is there a lack of activity? This thought brings me back to the death of older browsers and the advent of browser support for new/easier ways of doing things related to CSS and HTML. To bring us back to the original question, has the community outgrown the need for this, and the WebDesign, lists? To quote Eric: > Almost all the discussion in the months leading up to the hiatus was > conducted between a small number of subscribers. On the other hand, to quote Kathy: > LOl yes, 4. Do nothing ... Problem solved? ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
