As Phillippe says ... fluid. The 'limit' is based on readability and the amount and type of content in each section. You wouldn't want a text article to stretch to infinity, nor a site with only small amounts of content on a page (either by focal design or simple lack of content) to do it either.
Devices are all over the place and any design and markup for that design should evolve from very small to very large with whatever cap makes sense at the end points. Elizabeth Davies Web Application Developer Gallup, Inc. -----Original Message----- From: css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org [mailto:css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org] On Behalf Of Philippe Wittenbergh Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2016 8:03 AM To: JW <l...@sodesires.com> Cc: CSS-D <css-d@lists.css-discuss.org> Subject: Re: [css-d] Design Resolution > On May 15, 2016, at 8:52 PM, JW <l...@sodesires.com> wrote: > > What's the standard design resolution for web nowadays? I tried using 1400px > with and it came up too big. Fluid: from 250px to infinity (in practice that mean something of a maximum width of 1350px for us) Philippe -- Philippe Wittenbergh http://l-c-n.com/ ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/ All information in this message is confidential and may be legally privileged. Only intended recipients are authorized to use it. ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
