I would just convert to em and not rem and move on. Validator should be fine with em. If not, em can be converted to percent and do the same I believe. I usually use percent and em on fonts.
Hth, Best, Karl Sent from losPhone > On Jul 20, 2016, at 12:05 PM, John J <cr8...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Working on my code, I decided to see what they CSS validator had to say > about it, and it threw out 154 errors, most of which were about rem as my > value of measure for things like padding, type, borders, margin. > > I am using rem on advice of a developer who said that a certain pinhead, > un-named browser needs it; other browsers can use/deal with it too. > > Yet the validator threw a hissy..Should I abandon all efforts to support > arcane versions of this browser, and stick only with em? > > Thank you! > > John > ______________________________________________________________________ > css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] > http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d > List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ > List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html > Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/ ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
