Yeah I agree,
Also, I think the check boxes would look better before the highlight.
On Jul 6, 2011, at 4:25 PM, Brandtley McMinn wrote:

> the second link is missing .html at the end resulting in a 404. check that 
> next time. Secondly, why not just use google webmaster tools and analytics to 
> run A/B tests and let actual user data drive your decisions?
> 
> personally I feel the second page is cluttered and could be flowed better.
> 
> - Brandtley
> 
> On 7/6/2011 3:16 PM, Matthew Witek wrote:
>> http://www.knowledgenotebook.com/index2 404 error
>> On Jul 6, 2011, at 4:14 PM, justaguy wrote:
>> 
>>> Not the same, Mike, please take another look.  Don
>>> 
>>> On Jul 6, 4:17 pm, "Mike G."<[email protected]>  wrote:
>>>> Ummm exactly what do you want?  They are the same!?
>>>> 
>>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>> 
>>>> On Jul 6, 2011, at 3:48 PM, justaguy<[email protected]>  wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Good people of CSS design NG,
>>>>> I need your quick thoughts...
>>>>> Of the following two pages,
>>>>> http://www.knowledgenotebook.com/(current home page)
>>>>> and
>>>>> http://www.knowledgenotebook.com/index2.…(candidate home page)
>>>>> fyi, target audience are college students (their parents included,
>>>>> other stakeholders included), which one do you like better and why?
>>>>> Many thanks as usual.
>>>>> Don
>>>>> --
>>>>> --
>>>>> You received this because you are subscribed to the "Design the Web with 
>>>>> CSS" at Google groups.
>>>>> To post: [email protected]
>>>>> To unsubscribe: [email protected]
>>> -- 
>>> --
>>> You received this because you are subscribed to the "Design the Web with 
>>> CSS" at Google groups.
>>> To post: [email protected]
>>> To unsubscribe: [email protected]
> 
> -- 
> --
> You received this because you are subscribed to the "Design the Web with CSS" 
> at Google groups.
> To post: [email protected]
> To unsubscribe: [email protected]

-- 
--
You received this because you are subscribed to the "Design the Web with CSS" 
at Google groups.
To post: [email protected]
To unsubscribe: [email protected]

Reply via email to