On Dec 5, 2012, at 9:36 PM, "Wu, Stephen T., Ph.D." <[email protected]> wrote: > For 3.1.0 the type system should include more than just "LabMention, > ProcedureMention, SignSymptomMention, DiseaseDisorderMention, > AnatomicalSiteMention." It should also include the exhaustive list of > attributes, which would come as subtypes of Modifier.
+1 On Dec 6, 2012, at 8:20 PM, "Chen, Pei" <[email protected]> wrote: > Just taking a step back, should there always be a 1-1 mapping between human > annotated data (Knowtator schema) and the System annotated data (cTAKES type > system)? > If this is true, then should they really share the schema then? i.e. Can the > annotation tool(s) be auto generated/based off the type system schema or vice > versa then? Just thinking of ways we may save time with mappings… Ideally yes, they should share exactly the same schema. The main problem here is annotation tools. What we'd really want is an annotation tool that works directly off of a UIMA type system file. But I don't know of any such tool. (And no, the CAS Editor doesn't count - that's not usable for any real large-scale complex annotation.) Steve
