-Caveat Lector- ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Mon, 7 Dec 1998 11:19:10 -0800 (PST) From: Franklin Wayne Poley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [BCPolitics] Re: Is Ross Perot or isn't ? From: Franklin Wayne Poley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Addressing the general theme I raised on CTRL (the conspiracy list) I have to reassert my suspicion that this is a giant conspiracy to DELAY direct democracy. I was told yesterday by a credible politician that P. Manning, Canadian Reform and Official Opposition Leader was in the employ of the CIA before Reform Party days and he admits it. I think even a CIA half wit could figure out that direct electronic democracy is imminent. So why not claim credit for it when it happens (as part of party platform) but REFUSE TO LEAD THE CITIZENS in its implementation? The refusal to lead is an abrogation of political responsibility and a form of dishonesty. Part of the P. Manning character disorder, obvious to anyone here. FWP. On Mon, 7 Dec 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Subject: Ross Perot ? > > Mr. Poley, > > I too am disappointed with the lack of development on the > ELECTRONIC TOWNHALL. > > I cannot get even the slightest acknowledgement from Mr. Perot > about the Townhall. > > We must abandon the hope that someone big and powerful is going > to help us, substantially, to save our lives and freedom and focus > instead on what can be done to communicate and get action from > enough of the body politic to do it for ourselves. > > The really big players like Mr. Perot, Bill Gates et all are quite > vulnerable to total destruction by the Entente'. So we cannot blame > them for "abandoning people too stupid to survive without them". > > Remember, it is not neccessay to implement the ELECTRONIC > TOWNHALL on a nationwide scale at first anyway. It can be done at > the city or county level too. In fact it would make a winning platform > for a candidate to champion. > > This is what I advocate to the people that will listen to me. > > Thank you, > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > For forwarding to Ross Perot directly and personally via > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > > > > On Fri, 4 Dec 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > The great thing about internet voting is that is HAS TO LEAD to > > > a more comprehensive review of the issues and candidates. > > > > I expect so. It is all too easy for politicians to evade issues when they > > are presented by conventional media. However, the evasiveness is > > very obvious when it stays on the computer screens of the world. I > > discussed with other CITIZENS at a political meeting yesterday the > > prospect that both Preston Manning in Canada, Federal Reform and Official > > Opposition Leader in the Canadian Parliament and Ross Perot are just > > establishment shills disguised as reformers. In other words, their purpose > > is the delay and frustrating of direct democracy, not its implementation. > > Manning, I would say is one of the most dishonest political leaders in > > the last few decades of Canadian politics. Nothing has stopped him from > > honouring the signed commitment all of his MP's make to direct democracy. > > It can be done using one of many systems for an electronic infrastructure. > > > > > A thing like the ELECTRONIC TOWNHALL first discussed by Ross > > > Perot would turn our world around. Internet voting is a step in the > > > right direction. > > > > Sure it would. And what is stopping Ross Perot, computer tycoon, from > > lending 40 computers to Ted White, MP for a trial of direct electronic > > democracy in his riding of North Vancouver? The 40 internet connected > > computers would go in shopping centres, libraries etc. Recall and > > referendum proposals would go directly to the constituency office of the MP. > > Presently there is great public interest in a referendum on the Nisga'a > > Treaty which is a Nisga'a Nation-Federal-Provincial contract. Polls are > > running 2:1 in favour of a referendum in BC. The BC Reform Caucus holds > > most of the seats in BC. Starting with the Ted White riding they could > > implement a province-wide system of internet kiosks which would first see > > use for the Nisga'a Treaty. That would send a strong signal to the > > government of Canada about the kind of democracy this entire country > > should have to honour its Constitutional/Charter of Rights and Freedoms > > commitment to a "democractic society". > > If Perot were to design the electronic system for such a trial of > > direct electronic democracy and lend the equipment to Ted White he would > > prove his own sincerity and reap great political benefits. But the big > > question is whether Perot is being any more honest with the public than > > Manning. > > FWP. > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > *** British Columbia-the world's first direct electronic democracy under development http://www.onelist.com/subscribe.cgi/BCPolitics; http://users.uniserve.com/~culturex *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Help support ONElist, while generating interest in your product or service. ONElist has a variety of advertising packages. Visit http://www.onelist.com/advert.html for more information. DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
