-Caveat Lector-

http://www.newdawnmagazine.com.au/Resources/index.htm

The Hidden Face Behind Advertising
By Chris McLean

Is it only me, or have others become aware of new techniques being employed
in advertising? Advertising in essence isn't wrong - it's a way in which we
are informed of new products. But, and this is a big but, more and more
advertising is infiltrating our everyday lives, we cannot open our eyes in
the morning without some form of advertising staring back at us.

By definition, advertising is: (The Maquarie Encyclopedic Dictionary)
"advertise -v t 3. to offer (an article) for sale or (a vacancy) to
applicants, etc., by placing an advertisement in a newspaper, magazine,
etc. " (This being the most relevant definition, p.13, if you are wanting
to check the other definitions) Another definition, given by The
Educational Resources Informational Center (ERIC), in an article titled
'Educating The Consumer About Advertising' (author Stephen S. Gottlieb) is:
"Advertising can be defined as communication which promotes the purchase of
products and services, and advertisements are pervasive in the American
culture." No longer do these definitions of passive advertising hold true.
Increasingly, if we apathetically allow the advertisements to wash over our
TV dulled minds, we are not given a choice if we want to buy or not, and at
some point the ad we just watched will force us to buy the product it
promotes. That is, if we are not conscious of the intricate workings behind
the glossy fantasy worlds they portray. That is the point of this article,
to open the eyes of a few more people, and to make these people aware of
the new techniques being employed.

"If this text makes only one person think, then it has served it's
purpose."
- Zarkon, The Zarkon Principal

THE LINE BETWEEN ADVERTISING AND ENTERTAINMENT IS BLURRING

Once, a long time ago, it was possible to draw a line between advertising
and entertainment. Not anymore. In the apparent evolved entertainment
society of today, the advertising is the entertainment.

Product Placement, or Advertising Through Association With An Icon
Next time you are watching that favourite TV show, wide eyed, open mouthed
and in an induced state of stupor, drag your eyes off of the action, and
focus on the foreground, and on the backgrounds. Notice the way that
certain products are placed? The way the piece of walking talking silicon
picks up that can of soft drink, selectively holding the label to the
camera. In the peripheral of the main focus of movies is also another great
place to see the wonders of product placement in action. This form of
advertising is a passive one, but it does have its very own insidious
quality. The way that product placement works, is by taking the advertising
out of its own domain, and placing it in situations where it is seen to be
a part of everyday life. A character on the television casually walks to
the fridge, while reciting lines, casually saying "Do you want a drink?" to
another character. Whilst grabbing the article from the fridge, the
character makes sure the product's label is visible. The viewer doesn't see
this to be advertising, but just something that is done.

The companies take the advertising out of a noticeably familiar advertising
situation, where the consumer knows that the company is pushing their
product, and creatively place it into the script, where it seems to become
just part of every day life. Couple this with the association of a
prominent famous figure actually liking the product (they probably don't
though, and remember, the people on the TV aren't really real), and we have
a potent purchase stimulus... "Well if Kramer likes it, then damn it, it
must have something going for it. I'll just try it once to see what it's
like". The advertising has worked its wicked way, a sale has been made that
was directly influenced by the advertising. The other form of product
placement is the way in which company logos weasel their way into the
backdrops of shots on the TV and in movies. It seems to the impressionable
mind of the viewer that it is only a part of the backdrop, hell, it happens
so much, we can be excused for not noticing it.

It isn't just the one instance of the logo appearing that works, it is the
repetition of the same logo over and over causing it to lodge in our minds
and induce sales. The products that stand out and say "BUY ME", are ones
that carry a logo that has been repeated to us time and time before. This
sort of advertising just doesn't randomly occur. Big corporate dollars are
spent to ensure that certain products appear in specific places and scenes
in movies and on TV. Who is writing the scripts - the writers or the money?

The New Soap-Opera Ads
I'm sure that we have all seen these new breed of ads which have started to
insult our intelligence. It is an obvious form of product and service
advertising. However, turning an ad into a soap opera turns the attention
away from the advertising platform and to the actual soap opera element of
the campaign, making the advertising more appealing to the consumer. While
the actual product push is still recognisably there, the person watching
the ad doesn't shut it out as much because there is something new to keep
the interest up, while the product push still works its way into the head
of the watcher. Even though these ads are annoying to the point of
frustration, they still work, because the old adage 'bad publicity is the
same as good publicity' is very true. I have heard people saying, "have you
seen that new [insert company here] ad, isn't it bad/stupid/annoying?"
These people don't like the ad, but it has worked inversely because it's
still producing interest about the company and the products advertised.

The One Hour Advertising Phenomena
Who's idea was it to create TV shows about advertising? The worlds greatest
commercials blah...blah...blah. You sit there for an hour watching ads,
then in between this barrage, we get more ads. This is what we class as
entertainment? Again, lots of money is spent to get these shows to put up
certain ads - is it just coincidence that a certain soft drink always gets
a starring role?

THE CONSUMER PAYING TO ADVERTISE HAS NOW BECOME A FASHION STATEMENT

One of the most subversive and ingenious techniques is making the consumer
pay for a company's advertising by creating a whole designer market for
company logos. Please understand this is a totally manufactured market.
Let's look at the logic and agenda behind it: A big company makes it
desirable/fashionable to wear its clothing. This clothing is a generic
garment, be it a t-shirt, shoes, socks, whatever, with the actual logo as
the buying point. For some reason, the product's apparent quality and value
for money is tangential to the product's logo and how much money it costs.
When someone buys one of these products and wears it, they become a
walking, talking corporate billboard, the irony being that the person
actually paid for it.

Manufacturing the Market
The above is probably an unnecessary explanation, but where the engine of
this consumer bandwagon lies is in the superfluously extravagant and
over-financed advertising campaigns. Instead of searching for a market,
these companies just create their own. Let us take as a valid example the
manufactured corporate-rock bands.

The basis for this example is the way that these bands have been used by
their record companies to manufacture a whole generation of children into a
profit machine. The bands themselves are unquestionably popular with
certain sections of the population. This is the angle being worked,
targeting segments of society by over publicising such bands in the
appropriate formats, i.e. teenie-bopper magazines, mainstream saturday
morning music shows, etc. The publicity and hype not only is directed
towards record sales for the bands, but more importantly, it must be noted
the way band members always wear different t-shirts of other bands.
Generally, you don't see them wearing anything else apart from cut-off knee
length army pants, or some other knee length pants, the ever present
flannelette shirt, and a t-shirt advertising another band. All these band
shirts are, coincidentally(?), bands that are marketed by the same company.
Isn't that just cosy? What do we see coming out of this? Hundreds of people
walking about in, wait for it, a flannelette shirt, knee-length pants and a
band t-shirt. Admittedly this clothing style has been around far longer
than the bands, but, why all of a sudden do we have an influx of young fans
dressing exactly the same? All of them like little clones of the band
members? What the companies get out of this should be obvious. Each sale of
a t-shirt basically ensures a CD sale of the band the shirt is advertising,
due to the walking-corporate-billboard-and-I-paid-for-it effect. Add to
this a tangent of something spoken about before, Association With An Icon.
By making the bands wear t-shirts advertising other bands (you thought they
chose to do it?), an association is made by fans somewhere along the line
of "cool, they wear that bands' t-shirt, they must like them, I might just
buy that CD sometime." Again, sales are boosted by this line of thought.
This is not the only way that wearing advertising is made fashionable.
Whole new markets and areas within existing markets are manufactured. A few
of these are:

•American Basketball/Football/Baseball: Whole sub-cultures manufactured
around these sports in the same way as described above. •The Beauty Myth:
"We will tell you what is beautiful and what isn't. Our products are what
make people beautiful. To be happy you must be beautiful, and to be
beautiful you must buy our clothing and cosmetics." •Social Status
Enhancing Shoes That Can Be Worn As A T-Shirt: It seems strange that some
companies who primarily manufacture shoes, are making billions out of
manufacturing whole clothing cultures around their shoes. We all know the
companies in question.



SUBLIMINAL ADVERTISING

After reading that subtitle, what images sprung into your mind? Hidden
messages in 'rock' music telling the kiddies to go out and burn grandma? Or
maybe an ominous droning voice in piped music repeating 'buy...buy...buy'?
The latter is true. Audio cassettes and CDs are now for sale, and being
used, in supermarkets and other stores. These pump out your garden variety
elevator music, *but, they have subliminal messages. They are marketed as
subliminal tapes and bought as such, and you, dear consumers, are none the
wiser. Below are two (rather lengthy) quotes from an article titled "The
Battle For Your Mind", by a professional American hypnotist, Dick Sutphen.
He reinforces his knowledge by saying: " ...In talking about this subject,
I am talking about my own business. I know it, and I know how effective it
can be."

"...The oldest audio subliminal technique uses a voice that follows the
volume of the music. So, subliminals are impossible to detect without a
parametric equalizer. But this technique is patented and, when I wanted to
develop my own line of subliminal audio cassettes, negotiations with the
patent holder proved to be unsatisfactory. My attorney obtained copies of
the patents which I gave to some talented Hollywood sound engineers, asking
them to create a new technique. They found a way to psycho-acoustically
modify and synthesize the suggestions so that they are projected in the
same chord and frequency as the music, thus giving them the effect of being
part of the music. But we found that, in using this technique, there is no
way to reduce various frequencies to detect the subliminals. In other
words, although the suggestions are being heard by the subconscious mind,
they cannot be monitored with even the most sophisticated equipment.

"If we were able to come up with this technique as easily as we did, I can
only imagine how sophisticated the technology has become, with unlimited
U.S. Government and [corporate] advertising funding. And I shudder to think
about the propaganda and commercial manipulation that we are exposed to on
a daily basis. There is simply no way to know what is behind the music you
hear. It may even be possible to hide a second voice behind the voice to
which you are listening.

"The series, by Wilson Bryan Key, Ph.D., on subliminals in advertising and
political campaigns, well documents the misuse in many areas, especially
printed advertising in newspapers, magazines and posters.

"The big question about subliminals is: Do they work? And I guarantee you
that they do - not only from the response of those who have used my tapes,
but from the results of such programs as the subliminals behind the music
in department stores. Supposedly, the only message is instructions to not
steal. One East Coast department store chain reported a 37 percent
reduction in thefts in the first nine months of testing....

"The more we find out about how human beings work through today's highly
advanced technological research, the more we learn to control human beings.
And what probably scares me the most is that the medium for takeover is
already in place! That television set in your living room and bedroom is
doing a lot more than just entertaining you! "Before I continue, let me
point out something else about an altered state of consciousness. When you
go into an altered state, you transfer into right brain, which results in
the internal release of the body's own opiates: enkephalins and
beta-endorphines, chemically almost identical to opium. In other words, it
feels good - and you want to come back for more.

"Recent tests by researcher Herbert Krugman showed that, while viewers were
watching television, right-brain activity outnumbered left-brain activity
by a ratio of two to one. Put more simply, the viewers were in an altered

state... in trance more often than not. They were getting their
beta-endorphine 'fix.'

"To measure attention spans, psychophysiologist Thomas Mulholland of the
Veterans Hospital in Bedford, Massachusetts, attached young viewers to an
EEG [electroencephalograph] machine that was wired to shut the TV set off
whenever the children's brains produced a majority of alpha brain waves.
Although the children were told to concentrate, only a few could keep the
set on for more than thirty seconds!

"Most viewers are already hypnotized! To deepen the trance is easy. One
simple way is to place a blank, black frame every 32 frames in the film
that is being projected. This creates a 45-beat-per-minute pulsation,
perceived only by the subconscious mind - the ideal pace at which to
generate deep hypnosis.

"The commercials or suggestions presented following this alpha-inducing
broadcast are much more likely to be accepted by the viewer. The high
percentage of the viewing audience that has somnambulistic-depth [sleep
walking] ability could very well accept the suggestions as commands - as
long as those commands did not ask the viewer to do something contrary to
his morals, religion, or self-preservation.

"The medium for takeover is here! By the age of 16, children have spent ten
thousand to fifteen thousand hours watching television! That is more time
than they spend in school! In the average home, the television set is on
for six hours and 44 minutes per day - an increase of nine minutes from
last year, and three times the average rate of increase during the 1970s.

"It obviously isn't getting better. We are rapidly moving into an
alpha-level world - very possibly, the Orwellian world of '1984': placid,
glassy-eyed, and responding obediently to instructions..."

Subliminal Advertising Has Now Reached A More Blatant Level
Advertising seems to be manifesting from just informing, to blatantly
instructing consumers to buy. Walk down any aisle at the supermarket, have
a look at the shelves and the little advertising blurbs you see splattered
around, 'Buy our Product', 'Buy our product and this will happen to
you...', and many, many more. Many people are not even consciously aware
they are being 'instructed' to buy certain products. You will find this
blatant form of subliminal - quite easily in fact - the more you look
around when you are out and about in happy-go-lucky-consumer land.

The Competition Advertising Campaign
Another little trick used by companies is the competition campaign. This
advertising ploy is fairly well embedded into our consumer psyche. It is
where a company takes all attention away from the product, and places it
instead in what the consumer could possibly win by purchasing the product
repeatedly. How can you class this as subliminal? Well, subliminal, by
definition is (again, The Maquarie Encyclopedic Dictionary, p. 951)
"SUBLIMINAL, being or operating below the threshold of consciousness or
perception; subconscious." Being completely conscious and aware of their
actions, people make the decision to purchase, but out of the different
choices that could be made, in most cases, the product of choice is the one
which carries a competition stimulus. Therefore, the advertising is
subliminal because it prompted the consumer to purchase the product over
the possibly of gaining material wealth. The subconscious clicks into play:
The prize seems to be something the consumer needs, and the sale is made on
this point, not actually the real need to have the product that is
purchased. The choice from the many products displayed is made on the
manufactured subconscious desire to gain material wealth.

The Insertion Of Slogans Into Our Every Day Speech
At an alarming rate, we are being conditioned to repeat advertising slogans
as part of our everyday speech. Aldous Huxley used the term
'sleep-teaching' or 'hypnopaedia', in his book Brave New World, where
people are 'morally' conditioned to do and say things in response to every
day situations by having constructed phrases repeated to them while they
are asleep as children. In today's society, this is happening to children
and adults alike, and we don't have to be asleep for it to work. Companies
carefully construct slogans that they drum into us. To prevent falling prey
to what we are trying to illuminate, none of these slogans will be
reiterated here. Have a listen around you at the amount of times that
certain slogans are repeated. In the mediums of television and radio, these
slogans also carry a simple tune created to be memorable, and the slogan is
rhythmically repeated or sung with this tune. In one of the quotes used
earlier from Dick Sutphen, he was talking about one form of subliminal that
makes the speech follow the pattern of the music. Isn't this exactly what
some of these slogans and jingles do? This is how subliminal advertising
has reached a more blatant level. The messages no longer need to be hidden
from us, because they achieve the same goals when they are staring us in
the face. People all around us repeat these embedded slogans and catch
phrases as every day speech, parroting them as they would any old cliched
saying or anecdote. Walking talking advertising machines is what most of us
are becoming, and we are oblivious to it. Some of us even think it
humorous, laughing at the way some companies advertise their products, and
making jokes out of catch phrases. These are people who just can't see the
manipulation for the advertising, and if they can, they are apathetic and
ignorant toward the control.

IT DOESN'T MATTER HOW KIND HEARTED THE CAMPAIGN MAY SEEM, IT'S THE PROFIT
MARGINS THAT DRIVE IT FORWARD

For all the good intentions of multinationals when they run charity
campaigns - affiliating themselves with a 'worthy' cause - if there wasn't
something in it for them, do you think they would bother? What most people
don't realise is that the money they give to charities is a token gesture
to make them seem like the good guys, while their coffers grow larger as
they play on the good nature of consumers.

How often has a product decision been made on the fact that you may be
doing something worthwhile in giving money to a company that states '5
cents out of every purchase will go towards [insert charity organization
here]", or something along those lines? For all the 'seemingly' good
intentions of the company, they are only in it for the money they get out
of it, the reputation it builds for the company, and the future sales
generated because of this assumed reputation. These companies care about
money and money only, and will employ any tactic to get more of it.

Below is a hypothetical situation. However much it may seem to sound like a
real life situation, it is meant to be that way. A hypothetical situation
in consumer land...

Public interest has been generated by the mainstream media about the plight
of a race of people who have been grossly mistreated by their government,
in a part of the world which nearly no one has heard of until now. Everyone
is walking through the pastel coloured streets of consumer land talking
about how terrible it is, saying nasty things about the government, and so
on. They have a feeling of helplessness about the whole situation, because
watching the TV and shopping, which is what all good consumers do, isn't
going to do anything to help these people. So they don't try, they just
continue to say how bad it is to their friends as they hand their credit
card over the counter to the person at the checkout. A global spanning
multinational hamburger chain, pricks it's ears up. It jumps on the band
wagon, starting a large advertising campaign. The multinational, under this
premise, is saying that over a two day period, 5 cents out of every burger
sold will go toward helping these people. Ok, now that the situation has
been set, let's have a look at the figures. For simplicity, let us assume
that the average burger price is $1.50, and on average it costs this
company 30 cents for the actual 'food' part of the burger (this is not an
over exaggeration), and that 40 cents of the price goes toward other costs
like wages, electricity, etc. So all up we have a $1.50 burger, costing the
company 70 cents, and making a clear profit of 60 cents. Over a normal two
day period, this company sells 1000 burgers, generating a normal profit of
$600. Over the two day period when the campaign is on, they sell 1700
burgers, making an increase of 700 burger sales that can be directly linked
to their 'good will' campaign. Now 5 cents out of each of these sales goes
towards helping the mistreated, far-away, race of people. Out of $1020
clear profit for the two days, only $85 is donated, and making the net
profit $935. The company itself has gained a $335 increase because of this
campaign, and the poor people, who everyone is feeling so sorry for, only
get $85, which would only pay a small part of the costs to get food to
them, if there was enough money to actually buy food for them in the first
place. The multinational has successfully exploited these distant people to
gain big profits, and the people who inhabit not-a-care-in-the-world
consumer land are completely oblivious to the fact that the only people
they helped are the owners of the multinational hamburger chain. And they
don't care, because they've had their hit of 'helping their fellow people'
- after that, nothing else matters.

THE AFTERMATH

This is only the proverbial tip of the iceberg of the various subversive
ways in which advertising is being inflicted upon us. Whilst writing this,
I have been continually asking myself for justification on why I find these
methods insidious, annoying, intrusive and wrong. I am sure some of you may
be flaunting with the same questions. Firstly, choice is slowly being
replaced by direct orders to buy. Secondly, manipulative commercials,
seemingly harmless to the casual observer. When you begin to ignore the
rose coloured tint and peer into the inner workings of these commercials,
the realm that lies carefully hidden behind the facade of consumerism comes
to the surface. These observations above lead to other observations,
hopefully allowing you to wade through the crap, so that you can make
informed purchases, not manufactured ones. While the rest of the population
gets swept along with the blind current that is today's consumer based
society, where the mighty dollar is all that is needed to fulfill your
life, where the mighty dollar is a better substitute for reality than
reality itself, because the mighty dollar can make you forget what is
really happening, and create a fantasy world for you to inhabit.

Finally we come to the chain of ownership. Next time you are at the
supermarket, have a look at the fine print on the back of the product you
are about to purchase. You may find something like "[blah...blah] is a
division of [blah...blah]". Now toddle around until you find a product
which is openly produced by the larger company, look at the back again, and
you may just find that this company is owned by another larger one again.
For about five minutes of work, you can easily see where your money is
going to go, not just to the company you are purchasing the product from,
but to the larger company that owns this one, and so on up the chain of
ownership. Make sure you are aware what these companies are doing to the
planet and its inhabitants. By giving your money to these companies, you
are in fact supporting their activities. If you don't want your money to go
to these companies, it doesn't have to. There are bound to be many products
of equal value and quality that by purchasing you won't be supporting
undesirable multinationals. What are these actions? Below are just a few...

•An extremely large hamburger chain based in America. It sells french
fries, etc. If you support this company, you are supporting the depletion
of the Amazon, and a whole stack of other issues. There is a lot of good
writing on what this company is actually doing to the planet. Some of your
local political and environmental organizations should be able to help you
find this literature. •One of the world's largest cotton and synthetic
fibre manufacturers, also American based and owned, that has controlling
interests in a good percentage of the Australian market. If your money gets
through to these people, you are inadvertently supporting the prohibition
of the hemp fibre. Just watch where your money is going the next time you
buy toilet paper. A major tissue manufacturer is affiliated with these
people. The tissue manufacturer is owned by another company, who in turn
has a close relationship to the American company described above. Anyone
who knows the facts about the criminalisation of hemp, should know the
American company I am referring to. •A well know confectionery
manufacturer, mainly chocolate products, who is/was supplying off-milk and
milk byproducts to third world countries in Africa, where African people,
who have a genetic lactose intolerance, are dying because of it. Your
apathetic monetary support of this company is helping to poison millions of
people worldwide, just so this company can get fatter off the government
money paid to them.

This is only a vague outline of the many companies involved in heinous
crimes that are being perpetuated inadvertently by continued consumer
support. It is only when you start to become aware of what you are
supporting that we can begin to slow the snowballing control that these
corporations have upon us. At a complete loss for words.

The author can be contacted by email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Extracted from New Dawn No.40 (January-February, 1997)
© 1997 Chris McLean

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to