-Caveat Lector-

On Wed, 9 Dec 1998, William Hugh Tunstall wrote:
>What is your basic gripe about "white liberals"?

My 'gripe' as you put it is not with white liberals, but white
Liberals....

The 'capital L' variety are big on mouthing platitudes, but are the worst
racists and sexists around...

They talk the talk, but don't walk the walk...


>I'm curious. I'm a
>Native American (of European-Native American ancestry)...and I don't
>remember "white conservatives" or "white libertarians," for that matter,
>risking their lives on freedom rides to the south to end segregation in

That is because you remember liberals of the 'small L' variety...

BTW, I consider myself a white liberal (small L)...


>I guess I must be one of the deluded masses... I have two daughters of
>my own... I want them to be strong feminists...

I consider myself a feminist too...but not a Feminist, and I hope you're
not raising your daughters to be the 'capital F' variety...

okay, what's the difference between the 'capital' and 'small letter'
variety?  the 'capital' variety wear their designation like jewelry, an
adornment for show which is not an integral part of their being...

the 'small letter' variety just ARE...their philosophies are such an
integral part of their being, they just live it without thinking about it
(or feeling the need to crow about it and call attention to it)...

this applies to Conservatives/conservatives, too...


>his property.  So, I'm one hundred percent for women being free of the
>kind of crap they had to put up with back in the pre-60s era....

Then you don't want them to marry a white male Liberal, who are worst
sexists than any conservative or Conservative I've ever met...


>> On Tue, 8 Dec 1998, nurev wrote:
>> >Yeah I bet you like this. You're the fool who studies philosophy at feet
>> >of that loonytwat JanaButterfly.
>>
>> With the above statement, Joshua proves my point regarding the typical
>> white male Liberal's attitude towards women...

I notice you don't take exception to Joshua, good Liberal that he is,
referring to women by a pornographic term for the female sex organ...

I guess you don't mind if your daughters, of Native American descent, are
called squaws then...even tho the term 'squaw' means female genitalia...


June
        _...._
      .::o:::::.
     .:::'''':o:.
     :o:_    _:::
     `:}_>()<_{:'
       `'//\\'`
        /'  '\
               jgs

*-----------------------------------------------------------------------*
                        revcoal AT connix DOT com
*-----------------------------------------------------------------------*
 It is UNLAWFUL to send unsolicited commercial email to this email
 address per United States Code Title 47 Sec. 227.  I assess a fee of
 $500.00 US currency for reading and deleting such unsolicited commercial
 email.  Sending such email to this address denotes acceptance of these
 terms.  My posting messages to Usenet neither grants consent to receive
 unsolicited commercial email nor is intended to solicit commercial
 email.
*========================================================================*

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to