-Caveat Lector-

Rehnquist's stripes are old news - he added them long before this
impeachment business even began.

Barb

At 02:57 PM 1/15/99 -0600, you wrote:
> -Caveat Lector-
>
>STRIPED SLEEVES MEAN IMPEACHMENT IS MILITARY?
>=============================================
>
>(CNNS, 01/15/99) --  Those  are  not  just  striped sleeves Chief
>Judge William Rehnquist  is  wearing  as  he  presides  over  the
>impeachment  trial  of  Bill  Clinton.   Those  are  GOLD-striped
>sleeves.
>
>An  article in the New York Times (Electronic Edition) dated Jan.
>15, 1999, describes Judge  Rehnquist specifically as "resplendent
>in his black gown with four gold stripes on each sleeve."
>
>A commentary in the New York Post, by Steve Dunleavy,  also  sees
>gold, but Dunleavy describes "three gold stripes  on  his  robe."
>["We  Could  Witness  A  Total  Travesty If Republicans Fold," by
>Steve Dunleavy. NYPost, 1/15/99]
>
>There  is  disagreement  between  the  NYTimes  and  NYPost as to
>whether there are 3 or 4  stripes,  but both agree that those are
>gold stripes Judge Rehnquist is wearing.
>
>Why  the  sudden  new  fashion  in  judicial   wear?    Rehnquist
>reportedly  says he copied the gold-striped style "after seeing a
>Gilbert and Sullivan operetta." [Dunleavy. Op. cit.]
>
>Is Judge Rehnquist's explanation believable?   That  a  scholarly
>jurist,  the  Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, approaches
>the somber and serious business of presiding over the impeachment
>trial of a U.S. President with  such a flippant attitude?  One of
>the most serious proceedings, if not THE most serious proceeding,
>over which Rehnquist is ever to preside, and he is  so  humorous,
>light-hearted  and cavalier that he copies his style of robe from
>a Gilbert & Sullivan operetta?
>
>CNNS does not believe  Rehnquist's  explanation  as  to why he is
>suddenly wearing gold-stripes on his judicial robe.
>
>And since Rehnquist's Gilbert & Sullivan story is implausible and
>therefore  a  cover  story, and hides whatever the REAL reason is
>for the sudden change in judicial  wardrobe, then what is it that
>Rehnquist's cover story is meant to hide?
>
>                    -+- A Rosetta Stone -+-
>
>Rehnquist's gold  stripes  are  a  Rosetta  Stone, unlocking many
>mysteries.
>
>If Rehnquist is  wearing  4  gold  stripes  on  each sleeve, then
>according to "Ru Mills" (pseudonym)  those  4  gold  stripes  are
>equivalent to the rank of Full Admiral in the U.S. Navy.
>
>A  researcher has published to a conspiracy research mailing list
>([EMAIL PROTECTED]) what he has  uncovered as to the possible
>significance of Rehnquist's gold striped-sleeves.  He writes,  in
>part, that....
>
>  There  has  been some discussion among law researchers that
>  indicates  that  the  gold  fringe on the US flag indicates
>  martial law rule.  If you recall the old westerns when  the
>  US  cavalry  showed  up  they  all  had  gold braids on the
>  trumpet, flag, and on  the  shoulders.  We know for certain
>  that  they  were  under   martial   law,  for  the  federal
>  government was governing the territories directly  previous
>  to them entering as states.
>
>
>                -+- The Military Connection -+-
>
>In Edward Gibbon's great book, "The Decline and Fall of the Roman
>Empire,"  the author repeatedly describes how, with the accession
>of each new Roman  Emperor,  a pre-requisite was, often, approval
>by  the  military.   Following  the  death  of  Constantine,  for
>example, "a loud and unanimous declaration was procured from  the
>troops  that  they  would  suffer  none  except the sons of their
>lamented monarch  to  reign  over  the  Roman  empire."  Military
>support was crucial; without it, the Caesars could not rule.   As
>the  Roman  Empire  decayed  over the centuries, military support
>became increasingly necessary and  support  from the Roman senate
>was no longer very important.
>
>Over   several   years,   Sherman   Skolnick,   chairman  of  the
>Chicago-based public interest research group, Citizens' Committee
>To Clean Up The Courts, has reported on attempts by U.S. military
>brass to  arrest  their  Commander-in-Chief,  Bill Clinton, under
>provisions  of  the  U.S.  Military  Code   of   Justice.    Does
>Rehnquist's  gold striped-sleeve robe suggest that something like
>a military arrest or military trial has occurred or is occurring?
>Or  is the new-style judicial robe merely a symbolic message from
>the military, warning Clinton of their power?
>
>Contacted  by  CNNS,   Mr.   Skolnick   further  noted  that  the
>striped-sleeve style of judicial robe was *de  rigueur*  in  Nazi
>Germany.
>
>              -+- The Intelligence Connection -+-
>
>Heading the team of prosecutors conducting the impeachment  trial
>is  Congressman Henry Hyde.  Mr. Skolnick has repeatedly reported
>that Hyde  oversees  the  CIA  "Black  Budget," highly-classified
>accounts of how CIA spends its money.  Hyde  also,  according  to
>Skolnick,  is  a  retired Naval Reserve Commander.  So with Chief
>Prosecutor Hyde, we  have  another  murky figure participating in
>the developing drama.
>
>In  past  reports,  Ru  Mills  has emphasized two factions in the
>intelligence "community":  Faction 1  and  Faction 2.  Faction 1,
>reportedly, is internationalist and pro-New World Order.  Faction
>2, reportedly, is nationalist and anti-New World Order.   Faction
>1 has backed Bill Clinton.  Faction 2 is anti-Clinton.
>
>In a report dated Dec. 31,  1998,  Mills wrote that a key source,
>connected with Faction 2 and one she had not heard from for quite
>some time, had suddenly contacted her and relayed startling news.
>Although Mills' source gave his information with the caveat  that
>"anything can happen," he seemed extremely confident that Faction
>2  had  just  won  a  major  victory against Faction 1.  ["RMNews
>Source Says:   'Senators,  Congressmen....   Don't  Block  Up The
>Hall," 12/31/98]
>
>If Faction 2  has  indeed  triumphed  over  Faction 1, this would
>explain any evaporation of Bill Clinton's  strong-armed  base  of
>support.
>
>                -+- The Israeli Connection -+-
>
>The  deeper levels of Bill Clinton's current troubles are hard to
>fathom.  That he is in  trouble is unquestionable.  Another angle
>on the undercover source of the  president's  woes  lies  in  the
>ongoing Netanyahu/Clinton feud.
>
>Benjamin  Netanyahu,  Israeli Prime Minister, is nationalist, and
>is part of the right wing  in Israel's politics.  Bill Clinton is
>internationalist, and is identified  with  what  passes  for  the
>"left"  in U.S. politics.  When the Monica Lewinsky scandal first
>erupted in January  of  1998,  that  eruption reportedly occurred
>shortly after Bill Clinton had "dissed" Netanyahu by  delaying  a
>scheduled  meeting.  Netanyahu had been forced to wait, and wait,
>until Clinton at last deigned to see him.
>
>Speculation  exists  that  Monica Lewinsky was used as part of an
>Israeli "sting" operation against Clinton, possibly as revenge by
>Netanyahu.
>
>Recently,  information  has  surfaced  describing how Clintonista
>spinmeisters James  Carville,  Stan  Greenberg,  and Robert Shrum
>have been meddling in Israeli politics, seeking to  unseat  their
>enemy  Netanyahu  in Israel's upcoming election.  ["Bibi Battered
>By Bill's Boys' Barbs," NYPost, 1/10/99.]
>
>In an  apparent  counter-move,  unknown  operatives  burgled  the
>offices,   in   Washington,  DC,  of  above-mentioned  Democratic
>pollster Stan Greenberg.   Stolen  were  a  specific set of files
>dealing with the upcoming Israeli election.  No other files  were
>stolen.  "Several [Israeli] Labor legislators immediately pointed
>to  Prime  Minister  Benjamin  Netanyahu's  Likud  as  the guilty
>party."  [Reuters,  1/13/99.   "Washington  Break-In Hits Israeli
>Election Campaign."]
>
>Does Israeli intelligence, the Mossad, have its own Faction 1 and
>Faction 2?  How  does  pressure  for  release  of  convicted  spy
>Jonathan Pollard fit into all of this?  If Pollard is released to
>Israel  next  week,  that  will  help  Netanyahu's  chances to be
>retained as Israeli Prime  Minister.   All these undercover plots
>and counter-plots could be reflected, on a superficial level,  in
>Bill Clinton's trial for perjury and obstruction of justice.
>
>        -+- The Systematics/Foster/Israel Connection -+-
>
>Another  factor  in the puzzle is the late Vince Foster.  Foster,
>according to a classic series  of  articles by J. Orlin Grabbe, a
>former professor at the prestigious  Wharton  College,  may  have
>transferred   top-secret   missile   launch   codes   to  Israel.
>["Allegations  Regarding  Vince  Foster,  the  NSA,  and  Banking
>Transactions Spying," by J. Orlin Grabbe.]
>
>Foster's later "suicide"  is  as  puzzling  in circumstance as is
>Rehnquist's Gilbert & Sullivan judicial wardrobe.  Despite  THREE
>(count   'em,   THREE)   official  investigations  into  Foster's
>"suicide" (methinks thou dost investigate too much), all THREE of
>which concluded that Foster died  by his own hand, many Americans
>remain unconvinced.
>
>Though  many say Foster was murdered, the proper word to describe
>Foster's death is EXECUTED.  Foster, linked by several reports to
>an   alleged   National    Security   Agency   (NSA)   operation,
>"Systematics," and its successor, Alltel, was a high-ranking  NSA
>official.   According  to Sherman Skolnick, Foster held a rank in
>NSA equivalent to  a  General  in  the  military.   If Foster had
>committed treason by giving classified information to  a  foreign
>power,  he  may  have  been  tried  and  found  guilty by a "Star
>Chamber" type of secret  court.   "Treason is still punishable by
>death," notes Ru Mills' source.
>
>Another murky circumstance is the recent death, again by supposed
>"suicide," of  Alltel  vice  president  and  board member Charles
>Wilbourne  Miller,  on  Nov. 17, 1998.  ["Another Very Suspicious
>'Arkancide.'" World Net Daily, 1/12/99]
>
>          -+- Further National Security Concerns -+-
>
>According  to  a  report  from  Newsmax,  journalist  Christopher
>Ruddy's web site,  further  national  security concerns are being
>raised as to Bill Clinton's stated  knowledge  that  White  House
>phones   likely   were   "bugged"  by  foreign  spies.   "Clinton
>recognized in  a  telephone  conversation  with [Monica Lewinsky]
>that  foreign  intelligence  organizations  could,  without  much
>trouble, be listening in on their phone sex  and  other  musings,
>according  to  Lewinskys  detailed  and  unchallenged testimony."
>[Washington Post article by  Jim  Hoagland. qtd. in "Senate Trial
>Bombshell:   Clinton  As  Security  Risk,"  by   Cliff   Kincaid.
>Newsmax, 1/15/99.]
>
>Did  Clinton  do  anything  to thwart the perceived spying, other
>than to "propose an  absurd  cover  story to Monica?"  [Hoagland.
>Op. cit.]
>
>Yet another factor discernable as lurking beneath the surface  of
>what  may  be  a  show trial, the impeachment proceedings, is the
>treason implicit in the  Clinton/Red China connection.  Ru Mills'
>already cited source relayed to her that
>
>  The report of the sale of U.S. technology to China has done
>  it all.  It will  unravel  the  treason  of  the  Bush  and
>  Clinton administrations.  People forget the Bush family are
>  the  biggest investors in China.  Don't think this transfer
>  of technology started with  Clinton.  It started with Bush.
>  ["RMNews Source Says:   'Senators,  Congressmen....   Don't
>  Block Up The Hall," 12/31/98]
>
>
>                    -+- A Coup d'Etat? -+-
>
>Even  left-leaning,  mainstream  journalists have voiced opinions
>that the current impeachment trial of Bill Clinton is a sham, and
>that  a  conspiracy  lurks   beneath   the  surface.   But  those
>journalists do not  look  deeply  enough  when  they  call  it  a
>"Republican  coup"  against  the  president.  The strings of this
>trial are being pulled by  persons  a lot more hidden than "rabid
>Republicans."
>
>The  removal from office of Bill Clinton is apparently justified.
>But secret machinations  controlling  the  U.S. presidency are an
>affront to the ideal of democracy.  The public,  poorly  informed
>and denied their Right To Know, do not even know that they do not
>know.   They think instead that the facts involved in the present
>impeachment charade are  all  out  in  the  open,  and give their
>opinions on the matter based upon imperfect knowledge.  This news
>service also "does not know" -- but at  least,  in  the  case  of
>CNNS, we know that we do not know.
>
> +  +  +  +  +  +  +  +  +  +  +  +  +  +  +  +  +  +  +  +  +  +
>
>INFORMATION PLEASE:  Conspiracy Nation  News  Service (CNNS) is a
>co-operative effort.  Without the hints/rumors provided  by  many
>excellent  sources,  we could not exist.  Have YOU heard anything
>lately  that  might  be  important?   Pass  it  along  to  us  at
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  Anonymity is guaranteed.  If you  prefer, send your news tip or
>clues  on  same  to:   Brian  Redman,  310  S.  Prairie   (#202),
>Champaign,  IL  61820.   Or you can go to a pay phone and call in
>your news tip: 217-356-4418.
>  THEY will never tell us the whole truth about what is going on.
>But we, the People, working together, can find out what is REALLY
>happening.
>
>
>Brian Redman       | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | www.shout.net/~bigred/cn.html
>Editor-in-Chief    | ---------------Phone: 217-356-4418----------------
>Conspiracy Nation  |       "The perfect slave thinks he's free."
>
>DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
>==========
>CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
>screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
>and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
>frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
>spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
>gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
>be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
>nazi's need not apply.
>
>Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
>========================================================================
>Archives Available at:
>http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
>
>http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
>========================================================================
>To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
>SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
>SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>Om

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to