-Caveat Lector-

Barb Witt wrote:
>Linda, you give your reasons for questioning the character of Forbes,
>Perkins
>and Russell families (ironic, aren't you the Clinton supporter), but I
>question
>the relevancy.  I wonder:
>(1)  How is the historical origin of Forbes money relevant to whether or
>not the assertions of the authors of the subject articles is true?;
>(2)  Do you disagree with the premises stated by the authors?;
>(3)  If so, which ones, and why?;
>(4)  What is inherently evil about *trade secrets*?;
>(5)  What person who took an oath of secrecy spilled the beans to you?

++++++++++

Barb,

(1)  The owners of a magazine will not allow ideas to be expressed in their
magazine if those ideas will undercut their own livelihood.  I believe that
the drug trade is not only the "historical origin" of these families, but
that it persists to this day.  That is the main focus of some of us who have
been on this list for the longest time.  And we don't talk idly; we actually
research our theories because we want to know the truth.  I do support
Clinton most of the time.  I've been a Democrat all my life, and I believe
in equal opportunity.  I am against a society based on exclusion and
perpetuation and preservation of elites.  I am a suspicious person--one who
spends every waking hour of every day trying to figure out what is really
going on--reading between the lines.

Through reading and researching, I have begun to question, not only who is
behind the Clinton attacks, but who set Nixon up.  If you've read SILENT
COUP, by Colodny, you know there is evidence to indicate That the burglary
was botched in an attempt to bring Nixon down.  And there is a question
about the Hinckley attempt to kill Reagan shortly after he took office, as
well as the suspicious circumstances surrounding the downed plane Hausenflus
was on that led to the discovery of Iran-Contra.

I am tired of someone trying to remove our elected presidents of whatever
party by covert operations. I can't say that Forbes is behind these
attempted coups, but I have found that the persons involved in that magazine
have been associated with activities which I find to be highly questionable
up to the present day.  I have separate research available which I have
posted previously, which I could dig up if requested.

(2)  I'm not sure what the authors' premises were.  I had the impression
that they were glorifying the role of foreign capital in this country, in
addition to capital investment that historically in this country came from
primarily New York and Boston.  If you read about the investment in
railroads in the early 19th century, what you find is that a great many of
the bonds were marketed in Europe by various investment bankers.  Yet some
of the railroads were also financed by Bostonians.  How did they make the
money to invest in these projects?  Once they made the investments, how were
the investments protected?  Have you read BITTER FRUIT, by Stephen
Schlesinger and Stephen Kinzer?

(4)  Are trade secrets inherently evil?  Secrecy is inherently evil.  I
believe in openness.  I believe every qualified person should have the same
opportunity to participate in trade.  I do not believe that people who earn
their money through slavery and drug trafficking should be able to wash
their profits through legitimate business by using the guise of "venture
capital" investments and thereby gain control of strategic industrial
development.  That's what I believe has been done.  The proof is hard to
come by because the evil is hidden.  But I'll spend the rest of my life
trying to uncover the truth.
(5) Nobody spilled the beans to me, personally.  People who talk don't live
long it seems.

Linda

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to